![]() I"m going to set the Apollo up and see if that's a better way to go. But I don't like the latency, and I don't think the player will either!Īny suggestions? Is it just the way that Pro Tools hardware works as a core audio device? The in and out of the Apollo are actually -10, not +4! My Pro Tools hardware also integrates better with my headphone and playback system. PRO TOOLS OR LOGIC PRO WHICH IS BETTER 34,622 views 1.2K Dislike Share Save Description Andrew Masters 96. Why is that? I have an Apollo Twin Thunderbolt that I can use, but I'd rather use my normal path going in-Neves to a GML Compressor-rather than the mic or line inputs on the Twin. In Pro Tools, things are still usable with a 256 buffer! In fact, that feels better than 64 does in Logic. I just checked and compared and the latency with the same 64 sample buffer setting is about 3 times longer in Logic than in Pro Tools. ![]() ![]() Pro Tools is a must-have DAW for any composer who. I have a harp overdub session this week that is in Logic. Not only this Pro Tools also has film scoring, deep mixing functions, and real-time Audio Suite plugins. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. You can at least mess with it, get to know it and see if it makes more sense to. Its a free version of ProTools, the only difference is youre limited in the number of track and other things you can do. If you want to dip your toes in the water, you can check out ProTools First. I am using Pro Tools HD Native hardware as a core audio device in Logic Pro X 10.3.2. Another key difference is that Pro Tools is available for use on both Mac and Windows machines, but Logic Pro X is only available for Mac. Logic is a little cheaper than ProTools if you need to buy one. ![]() I've been a Pro Tools guy forever, but I have come to really enjoy Logic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |